The TRUTH Behind FLIGHT 93 Movie

The A & E film entitled FLIGHT 93 LIED about what REALLY happened on that airplane.


The February 3, 2006 issue of ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY contains a preview for the FLIGHT 93 movie, which premiered last night, Monday, January 30, 2006, on the A & E network, from 9:00 to 11:00pm. EW gave this propaganda piece a B rating, which is outrageous, considering the amount of fantasy and outright lying that had to be done, just to tell the "story" of what happened to that airliner that day.

It is a STORY that is neither believable, nor is it humanly possible, given the current laws of physics that were at work on that day, and every day, for that matter.

According to the brand-new Stephen King novel, which is entitled CELL, there are 196 million cell phones in the USA alone. Therefore, the chances of you, the reader, owning one (or have at least used one) are pretty huge. And, as anyone who owns and regularly uses a cell phone knows, there are places where one can go, where the phone is basically useless, as no signal can be had.

Among such places are ANYWHERE there is NO tower in the immediate area.

If I cannot even talk to my wife halfway across town, how can I expect a cell phone to work on an airplane, 20,000 or 30,000 feet in the air?!

That is just one of many problems and unexplainable aspects of the government's own conspiracy theory concerning FLIGHT 93, which is not only an insult to my intelligence, but is also clearly impossible, given the circumstances which cannot be swept under the rug.

Among the irrefutable evidence of the plane being SHOT DOWN is the publicly-withheld tape of the last moments of the flight. Listening to that recording, one can actually hear the plane being shot down, just a short moment before the recording goes dead. The wreckage was spread out over a six to eight mile area. A plane flying straight into the ground does NOT leave its' wreckage spread out over a six mile zone. A plane flying straight into the ground deposits the wreckage in the hole that was created by the crash.

Watching the FLIGHT 93 film, several things caught my attention.

A great deal of effort and screen time was expended to legitimize the use of cell phones on that flight. However, the reader checking into the PROJECT ACHILLES cell phone testing that was done, and that reader will discover that the use of cell phones are simply NOT POSSIBLE on a plane flying 20,000-30,000 feet in the air.

The early moments of the film set up the heroes, simply by showing their boarding passes being printed. The list of those that the makers of this film wanted to propagandize and mythologize were as follows:



The FLIGHT 93 Heroes Make Their Plan


01) Todd Beamer - The "Let's Roll" guy

02) Mark Bingham - Calls his mother, announcing "Mother, it's Mark Bingham ..."

03) Tom Burnett, Jr. - Showed making several cell phone calls, all IMPOSSIBLE.

04) Jeremy Glick - Showed calling his wife on a cell phone. Again, IMPOSSIBLE.

05) Lou Nacke - The guy who pushed the cart into the cockpit door, attempting to breach the lock inside.

These were the instigators and heroes who tried to save the plane, as the mythology would like us all to believe. Several of these people were shown making multiple cell phone calls, and about 15 calls total were shown as being made by people on the plane.

I'm sorry, but this is ridiculous.

It is IMPOSSIBLE to make cell phone calls while aboard the plane. For starters, it is against FAA regulations to use a cell phone during a flight. Also, every single time I have flown since the advent of cell phones, I have seen the stewardess ask that everyone turn off their cell phones and pagers, as it could interfere with on-board flight instruments.

I also found it to be very interesting that while describing the terrorists, they are said to "look like Iranians." This was a propaganda seed for what is to come. How did IRAN become part of 9/11?! Man, these people sure are getting desperate, to strike up such a nonsensical connection!

Then, we have the infamous "Hello, mother, this is Mark Bingham." speech, which goes against the way in which every one I know talks. Also, when you dear reader, call your loved-ones, do you announce who you are by using your LAST NAME? Of course you don't! I always thought that this was unbelievable, since I first heard about it.

Several times throughout the film, an announcer said that the film was being broadcast with LIMITED COMMERCIAL INTERUPTIONS, about every twenty-five minutes or so. This was done to heighten the tension, and to more easily control and manipulate the emotional state of those watching.

The other part of the story of Todd Beamer talking to Lisa Jefferson from Verizon for ten to fifteen minutes is also unbelievable. Wouldn't YOU be asking to speak with YOUR loved-one directly, and not spend the last moments of your life talking with a complete stranger?

I know that I sure would be asking to speak with my wife, before I spent any amount of time talking with a stranger. At a minimum, I would have asked for a conference call between myself, my wife, and the operator.

The so-called PLAN these people had was one of the worst I have ever heard of. If YOU were aboard this plane, would you want to get it on auto-pilot or radio in for assistance in landing the plane? The PLAN they picked (or just worked out on its' own) was to fly it straight into the ground?! I would believe that the best way to deal with this would have been to gain control of the cockpit, and then radio in for some instructions on how to land at the nearest airstrip or airport destination.

I would also think that there would have been some sort of PLAN to pull the hijackers out of the cockpit, which was not what was shown, hence it was a BAD PLAN.

As far as symbolism and crypto-numerology is concerned, here are a couple of quick facts about FLIGHT 93:

01) FLIGHT 93 had 44 people on board total. This is a multiple of 11, the master number for the 9/11 attacks.

44 = 11 x 4

02) The number 93 comes up when the flight numbers of the two planes that hit the towers are added together and divided by two:

11 + 175 = 186 ÷ 2 = 93

03) The number 93 is also the central number of Thelema, the spiritual system taught by Aleister Crowley.

04) Federalist Paper # 93 discusses the nation under a failed Constitution.

Also, keep in mind that this was the 4th hijacked flight, which is one more "4" for you. At the end of this essay, there is a page that goes into GREAT DETAIL about the numerology that had been embedded into the false-flag terror events of 9/11. Check it out, it is an EXTENSIVE LISTING of all the various permutations and crypto-numeric coding that were a part of the occultism associated with the events of the day George W. Bush and his Bush Crime Family minions committed high-treason against the country they were supposed to be representing and protecting.

In summation, the FLIGHT 93 film shown on A & E was a travesty, and an insult to the memories of those who died on that flight. What was also surprising to me, was that the final moments on the plane were NOT shown, which was a rather peculiar ommission, given the completeness of the rest of the presentation. Those enemies within the gates are growing desperate, and the manner in which CELL PHONES were shown in this film, it is clear that they desperately want Americans to BELIEVE the cell phone myth of these phones working on a plane 20,000-30,000 feet in the air.

I will believe that canard when I come to believe again in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and the Tooth Fairy ...


Sources:

The following sources were used in the creation of this Kentroversy Paper . . .

Killtown's "Whatever Happened To Flight 93?" Page

Federal Aviation Administration - Get The Facts On Cell Phone Use (August 2005)

A & E - Flight 93 webpage

The Coincidential Numerology of 9/11 - A MUST READ PAGE!

Project Achilles - Cell Phone Use on Jet Airliners

The Memory Hole - Air Traffic Control Recording of 9/11 Flight 93

9/11

Todd Beamer

Cell Phones

Flight Data Recorder

Project Achilles